Last week there was a significant “Energy Technology” announcement in Manchester. This article was supposed to be written/published last weekend, but Storm Darragh and our subsequent 20 hour power cut proved more than capable of disrupting the carefully laid plans of both mice and men!
Hastily returning to a rather damp Manchester on December 5th, here is a recording of the meat of the initial presentation by Devrim Celal, Chief Marketing and Flexibility Officer of KrakenFlex Limited, speaking at the launch of the “Mercury Consortium” at the “UK’s first energy tech superhub”:
Devrim’s presentation was followed by a panel session with representatives of four “manufacturers”, which we will cover at a future date. After a “networking break” there was another panel session with speakers from four “utilities”, introduced by Arshad Mansoor who is President and CEO of the Electric Power Research Institute. Here’s what Arshad had to say:
Think of a vision, where in the next 6 months there is a Mercury guide book, guidelines, for batteries that are used in homes. And let’s say that guide book, guideline, Mercury book says “Here are the functionalities that a battery should have”. Let’s say that one of the functionalities is “provide frequency response to the grid”. One of many, that will document all of the functionalities. Then for each one of those functionalities for frequency response it will document what are the requirements for you to offer that functionality. Maybe latency is 50 milliseconds, I don’t know, maybe something. Then it will look at what grid services you should do, maybe under voltage protection, frequency ride through. It will talk about what kind of control and communication you need. It will talk about cybersecurity. All these standards exist.
Which brings me back to Devrim’s presentation, during which he presented this slide of “standards” which the Mercury Consortium will presumably be referencing, but not changing:
Now here’s the thing. Regular readers may recall that on November 22nd I attended the kick off meeting of IEC SyC SE ahG 11? If you click that link you will you will discover that ad hoc Group 11’s mission is:
To consider the implementation of international residential flexibility system standards, their compatibility with national requirements, and propose best practice:
* To ensure the compatibility of end-to-end system solutions at international level,etc. etc.
To the best of my knowledge none of the organisations represented at the Mercury Consortium launch either in person or on Devrim’s “standards” slide are also represented on the learned International Electrotechnical Commission committee set up to solve what sounds to be remarkably like the very same problem that Mercury is intending to address.
It’s hard to be sure at this early stage, but based on the information revealed at the Mercury Consortium launch event I get the distinct impression that their approach to “residential flexibility” differs from that of the international standards community. Mercury seems intent on “direct” control of domestic “energy smart appliances” by “utilities” and “aggregators”, whereas the assorted standards bodies on the European side of the North Atlantic favour “indirect” control. I’d hazard a guess that most of the Mercury consortium members have yet to take on board the message of the British Standard Institution’s 2021 PAS 1878 “guide to industry“, BS EN 50491-12-2:2022, or the work of the IEC SC 23K committee on the 63402 series of international standards.
Be that as it may, the Mercury Consortium launch event concluded with a “fireside chat” between Greg Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of Octopus Energy, and Lawrence Jones, Senior Vice President, International Relations of the Edison Electric Institute:
Please note in particular Greg’s closing remarks:
I think what we’ve got to do, what we have a responsibility to do, is to share far more than we normally would, so that the World changes faster, and then we just have to bet on ourselves to win in that game.
But ultimately, in this sector unlike almost any other, I actually think that’s a winning strategy…We do have to relax a little bit, when… everyone’s trying to divide “the pie” to get their value share, and in doing so they are just making the pie smaller. We’ve got to get out and make a massive pie, and then we’ll use the 2030’s to work out who gets what.
Hear, hear Greg!
And just in case it’s of interest to the nascent Mercury Consortium, we’ve been betting on ourselves since the “artistic impression” of the SaMDES project at the top of this article was created when we changed the company name in 2012.